Freedom: if anyone ever asks
May 18, 2007
The process is horrible.
Just so you all know - if anyone finds themselves in the same position, or is approached by someone in the same position wondering if it’s worth pursuing criminal charges in a historical sexual abuse case…the process is horrible.
It has nothing to do with benefiting the vicitm. In fact, right now, I’m not even considered the victim. I’m a witness. Not even a complainant at this point. Just a witness.
And so far from what I can tell, I’m the one under investigation. There has been no charge laid. A big difference between the police and SIU. The few people I know who are police are stunned that there has been no charge yet. In the policing world - our locals anyway - are mandated to lay a charge when a statement has been made - unless there is clear evidence that the complaint is false, they HAVE to lay a charge. Not SIU. Their mandate is to increase public confidence in the police. Big difference between the two.
I thought going into this that it was going to unburden me, I felt at the beginning that I had given it away somehow. It’s turned into a much bigger burden than before, because now I have to justify. Why haven’t I talked about all of the gory details to people I’ve confided in? Why did I make a criminal injuries claim for one offender, but not the other? Why didn’t I come forward sooner? Why have I talked about it to so many people, but in such vague terms?
I haven’t gone into fine detail with every disclosure because it hurts to. Because it makes other people uncomfortable as well as mysef and because when I do people see me differently.
I’ve made only one criminal injuries claim (so far) because the process is humiliating and exhausting and I don’t know if it’s worth the work yet.
I didn’t come forward sooner because I wasn’t able to. I didn’t come forward sooner because I was afraid of the process - and I was right to be.
I don’t have any other answers - stop asking me the same fucking questions.
What I want to know why the investigation hasn’t turned to my uncle. Why when given names of officers that have been close to **** who are actually aware or involved in other assaults with him - have the investigators not even written their names down as a possible person to interview? When the officer I spoke with originally said that he wasn’t surprised by anything I was saying but couldn’t continue the interview because he had just played golf with **** a short time ago - why has he not been interviewed by the SIU to clarify ”why” he’s not surprised?
And if he’s not surprised why does he still have a fucking job keeping our city “safe”???
The process is horrible. If anyone ever asks.